Key result
A preterm neonate with Wolcott-Rallison syndrome presented with neonatal diabetes and a double outlet right ventricle, highlighting a rare association with complex congenital heart disease.
Case Report (n=1)
This case highlights a rare association between Wolcott-Rallison syndrome, neonatal diabetes, and complex congenital heart disease (double outlet right ventricle).
Documents congenital heart disease in WRS; leaves open whether this association warrants routine cardiac screening in affected infants.
INTRODUCTION: Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (WRS) is a rare, autosomal recessive disorder with infancy-onset diabetes mellitus, multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, osteopenia, mental retardation or developmental delay, and hepatic and renal dysfunction as main clinical findings. Cardiovascular system is very rarely affected and there are a limited number of publications where WRS is associated with congenital heart disease. The aim of this interesting case is to report an infant with Wolcott - Rallison syndrome, type I diabetes mellitus, and complex congenital heart disease, diagnosed in a pre term neonate. CASE REPORT: A case of preterm neonate who presented immediately after delivery with hyperglycemia and heart murmur. Clinical and laboratory investigation showed diabetes mellitus type I and double outlet right ventricle. Genetic examination showed classic mutations in the EIF2AK3 gene - eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α kinase 3. Conclusion: Diabetes in neonatal age raises doubts about the possibility of association with the syndrome and other diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bejiqi et al. (2018) conducted a case report in Wolcott-Rallison syndrome, neonatal diabetes, double outlet right ventricle (n=1). Wolcott-Rallison syndrome (EIF2AK3 gene mutation) was evaluated. A preterm neonate with Wolcott-Rallison syndrome presented with neonatal diabetes and a double outlet right ventricle, highlighting a rare association with complex congenital heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: