Product changeover is becoming increasingly critical in planning assembly capacity which may be manual or automated with supporting part-holding and conveying devices. The basic choice is between assembly systems that are more product-specific, such as dedicated assembly heads, and those that are relatively flexible, such as manual or robotic systems. A rigid system would require frequent transitions as product variety increases, and may nullify any scale economies. A flexible system, on the other hand, though more expensive, can incorporate product changeovers more easily and would therefore require less transitions, creating scope economies. A quantitative analysts to study such interactions of system parameters with a view to developing understanding and procedures for dynamic planning of flexible assembly capacity is the objective of this paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amiya K. Chakravarty (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: