Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-crystal X-ray structures have been determined for the difluoro(porphyrinato)silicon(IV) complexes trans-(Por)SiF(2) (Por = the dianions of tetra-p-tolylporphyrin (TTP) and tetrakis(p-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)porphyrin). Crystallographic data for (TTP)SiF(2).Et(2)O: monoclinic, space group C2/c, a = 30.228(4) Å, b = 9.913(4) Å, c = 15.474(5) Å, alpha = gamma = 90 degrees, beta = 114.58(3) degrees, V = 4217(2) Å(3), Z = 4, R1 = 0.0588. Crystallographic data for (TTFP)SiF(2): monoclinic, space group C2/c, a = 31.557(2) Å, b = 9.546(1) Å, c = 15.941(1) Å, alpha = gamma = 90 degrees, beta = 115.83(1) degrees, V = 4322.4(8) Å(3), Z = 4, R1 = 0.0489. In both structures, the silicon lies in a slightly distorted octahedral geometry (average distances: Si-F 1.642 Å and Si-N 1.919 Å) with the fluorides in a trans configuration, and the porphyrin is in a ruf nonplanar form. The trans-(Por)SiF(2) structures were compared to the structures of related hexacoordinate cis-difluorosilanes and other group 14 metalloporphyrins. (TTP)SiF(2) readily reacts with excess MeMgBr or LiPh to give (TTP)SiMe(2) or (TTP)SiPh(2), respectively, in contrast to related hexacoordinate cis-difluorosilanes which do not react with strong nucleophiles. The enhanced reactivity of (TTP)SiF(2) may be a combination of a trans-effect, even though the structural parameters for cis and trans Si-F bonds and Si-N bonds are essentially the same, and a single-electron transfer process involving the porphyrin ligand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kane et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: