Computational screening of metal–organic framework (MOF) materials for selective oxygen adsorption from air is used to identify new sorbents for oxyfuel combustion process feedstock streams. A comprehensive study on the effect of MOF metal chemistry on gas binding energies in two common but structurally disparate MOFs has been undertaken. Dispersion-corrected density functional theory (DFT) methods were used to calculate the oxygen and nitrogen binding energies with each of 14 metals, respectively, substituted into two MOF series, M 2 (dobdc) and M 3 (btc) 2 . The accuracy of DFT methods was validated by comparing trends in binding energy with experimental gas sorption measurements. A periodic trend in oxygen binding energies was found, with greater oxygen binding energies for early transition-metal-substituted MOFs compared to late transition metal MOFs; this was independent of MOF structural type. The larger binding energies were associated with oxygen binding in a side-on configuration to the metal, with concomitant lengthening of the O–O bond. In contrast, nitrogen binding energies were similar across the transition metal series, regardless of both MOF structural type and metal identity. Taken together, these findings suggest that early transition metal MOFs are best suited to separating oxygen from nitrogen and that the MOF structural type is less important than the metal identity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parkes et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: