Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief OBJECTIVE To investigate the number and type of complications associated with global endometrial ablation using public-access governmental databanks. METHODS MEDLINE (PubMed) and the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) databases were searched for entries for the four US Food and Drug Administration–approved global endometrial ablation devices. RESULTS Traditional MEDLINE and bibliography searches yielded reports of two cases of hemorrhage, one case of pelvic inflammatory disease, 20 cases of endometritis, two cases of first-degree skin burns, nine cases of hematometra, and 16 cases of vaginitis and/or cystitis. A search of the US Food and Drug Administration MAUDE database yielded reports of 85 complications in 62 patients. These included major complications: eight cases of thermal bowel injury, 30 cases of uterine perforation, 12 cases in which emergent laparotomy was required, and three intensive care unit admissions. One patient developed necrotizing fasciitis and eventually underwent vulvectomy, ureterocutaneous ostomy, and bilateral below-the-knee amputations. One of the patients with thermal injury to the bowel died. CONCLUSION Use of the US Food and Drug Administration MAUDE database is helpful in identifying serious complications associated with global endometrial ablation not yet reported in the medical literature. Use of a public-access governmental database uncovered serious complications associated with global endometrial ablation devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurtcheff et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: