The effects of microcatchment slope and length on runoff and erosion rates were studied under 18 rain storms to get information for design of water harvesting systems. Two replicates of a two‐factor experiment, including 1, 5, 10, and 15% slopes and 3‐and 6‐m lengths, were built on a gravelly sandy clay loam (mixed mineralogy) using 11.2 t ha −1 of NaCl mixed into the surface 2 to 5 cm of soil followed by compaction with a 6‐t roller after a heavy rain. Both slope and length had effects on runoff significant at the 0.1% probability level but the effect of rainfall intensity was not significant. The best fit linear model of runoff, Q , (cm) vs. rainfall, P , (cm) was Q = 0.858( P − 0.34) which explained about 98% of the variability in runoff on individual plots for individual storms but which explained no differences in runoff among treatments. A nonlinear model incorporating slope, s , (m/m) and length, x , (m) accounted for about 96% of the variability in average total runoff among treatments. This model, Q = ( s 0.0453 x −0.183 + 0.183)( P − 0.339), shows that the important differences in runoff among treatments can be explained by slope and length alone for our conditions. Water quality analyses indicated that only a minor salinity problem but slight to moderate permeability problems might be expected. However, no apparent problems have arisen in 12 yr of grape ( Vitis vinifera ) and fruit tree ( Prunis sp.) cultivation in a water harvesting system using our catchment on the same soil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evett et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: