Key result
A machine-aided flexibility protocol significantly increased hemodynamic factors compared to resting values, though all values remained within American College of Sports Medicine guidelines.
Why the study?
Does a machine-aided PNF flexibility protocol alter heart rate and blood pressure in subjects?
Observational (n=15)
Does a machine-aided PNF flexibility protocol alter heart rate and blood pressure in subjects?
Machine-aided PNF flexibility exercises cause significant but safe increases in heart rate and blood pressure.
Machine-aided PNF may elicit safe hemodynamic rises in healthy subjects; leaves open effects in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Heart rates and systolic and diastolic blood pressures of 15 subjects were measured before, during, and after a series of four proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) flexibility exercises. The protocol for the study involved the use of two new machines, one designed to increase flexibility of the erector spinae, the other the hamstrings. Each machine provided constant feedback of isometric force, angular displacements, time of contraction, repetitions, and other exercise variables. Each bout of exercise involved an isometric contraction of the lengthened agonist muscle group (12 sec) followed by a concentric contraction of its antagonist in order to place the body part in a more stretched position. Hemodynamic measurements were determined at both a perceived maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and at 50% MVIC. Significant increases in hemodynamic factors were observed when exercise measures were compared to pre- and postexercise (resting) values. Higher values, though not significantly so, were found at MVIC than at 50% MVIC on both machines. All values were well within the guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holt et al. (1995) reported an observational. Machine-aided proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) flexibility exercises vs. Pre- and postexercise (resting) values was evaluated on Heart rates and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. A machine-aided flexibility protocol significantly increased hemodynamic factors compared to resting values, though all values remained within American College of Sports Medicine guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: