This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Using an intensity rating with no external calibration, experiments were designed to measure the sensory oil‐water partition coefficients of four aroma molecules (benzaldehyde, ethyl butyrate, linalool and acetophenone) as the ratios of concentration producing stimuli of equivalent intensities. Flavored water and oil phases were successively assessed for odor intensity by 24 panelists who were given total freedom regarding scaling strategy. Each session combined five concentration levels of three out of the four studied aromas in a solvent (water or oil). A predominant concentration effect was found for each aroma in both solvents and concentration dependencies of perceived intensity above water and oil were similar. Experimental data were modeled with Fechner, Stevens and Hill equations. Combining results above water and oil solutions to feed a common model led to the evaluation of an overall sensory oil‐water partition coefficient for each aroma compound. All three models produced similar partition coefficient values for each aroma that were lower than the related instrumental partition coefficients. Biases previously detected when external calibration had been used were reduced in a large proportion while suggested enhancement of odor intensity by water vapor could not be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brossard et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: