Summary Surface complexation of SO 2− 4 and H + exchange were compared between goethite, gibbsite and a soil material from a podzol B horizon. Intrinsic equilibrium constants were determined for the surface complexation of SO 2− 4 and H + using the diffuse layer model (DLM). Three surface group configurations for the SO 2− 4 adsorption were tested. A model with only one SO 2− 4 surface species and no H + explicitly taking part in the reaction gave the overall best prediction of adsorption. The concomitant H + exchange occurring during SO 2− 4 adsorption was attributed to decreased surface potential caused by charge neutralization in the inner layer. The H + /SO 2− 4 stoichiometric ratios (η) were determined by back‐titration under different pH, ionic strength ( I ) and SO 2− 4 concentrations. The experimentally determined η was close to 1 for all materials at I = 0·1 M but 1·5, 1·0 and 1·7 in I = 1 mM for goethite, gibbsite and the soil suspension, respectively. The DLM gave a quantitatively correct description of SO 2− 4 and H + exchange at small I, but predictions were less accurate at large I. The surface complexation model give insight in the role of SO 2− 4 adsorption for the reversibility of soil acidification but remain to be evaluated in experiments more closely related to field conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erik Karltun (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: