Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the population structure of Enterococcus faecium causing bloodstream infections (BSIs) in a tertiary Spanish hospital with low glycopeptide resistance, and to enhance our knowledge of the dynamics of emergence and spread of high-risk clonal complexes. METHODS: ) and clonal relationship (SmaI-PFGE, MLST evaluated by goeBURST and BAPS). RESULTS: The increased incidence of BSIs caused by enterococci [2.3‰ of attended patients (inpatients and outpatients) in 1996 to 3.0‰ in 2014] significantly correlated with the increase in BSIs caused by E. faecium (0.33‰ of attended patients in 1996 to 1.3‰ in 2014). The BSIs Enterococcus faecalis:E. faecium ratio changed from 5:1 in 1996 to 1:1 in 2014. During the last decade an increase in E. faecium BSIs episodes in cancer patients (10.9% in 1995-2005 and 37.1% in 2006-15) was detected. Ampicillin-susceptible E. faecium (ASEfm; different STs/BAPS) and ampicillin-resistant E. faecium (AREfm; ST18/ST17-BAPS 3.3a) isolates were recovered throughout the study. Successive waves of BAPS 2.1a-AREfm (ST117, ST203 and ST80) partially replaced ASEfm and ST18-AREfm since 2006. CONCLUSIONS: Different AREfm clones (belonging to BAPS 2.1a and BAPS 3.3a) consistently isolated during the last decade from BSIs might be explained by a continuous and dense colonization (favouring both invasion and cross-transmission) of hospitalized patients. High-density colonization by these clones is probably enhanced in elderly patients by heavy and prolonged antibiotic exposure, particularly in oncological patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tedim et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: