Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, N,N′-bis(4-aminophenyl)-N,N′-di(4-methoxyl-phenyl)1,4-phenylenediamine [(OMe)2TPPA-diamine] and various dianhydrides such as oxydiphthalic dianhydride (ODPA), 3,3′,4,4′-diphenylsulfonetetracarboxylic dianhydride (DSDA), pyromellitic dianhydride (PMDA), and 1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxylic dianhydride (NPDA) were used to synthesize new functional polyimides (OMe)2TPPA-ODPI (ODPI), (OMe)2TPPA-DSPI (DSPI), (OMe)2TPPA-PMPI (PMPI), and (OMe)2TPPA-NPPI (NPPI), respectively for memory device applications. For comparison, the corresponding (OMe)2TPPA-6FPI (6FPI) was also added into the discussion. The differences of HOMO energy levels, LUMOs energy levels, and dipole moment among these five polyimides with different electron-withdrawing linkage were investigated and demonstrated the effect on the memory behavior. With the electron-withdrawing moiety intensity of polyimides increasing, the retention time of corresponding memory device increases. ODPI didn't have memory properties, 6FPI exhibited DRAM characteristic, and PMPI with stronger electron-withdrawing linkage revealed SRAM behavior. NPPI with the strongest electron-withdrawing linkage showed WORM type non-volatile memory behavior. Interestingly, DSPI have the LUMO energy levels between 6FPI and PMPI but revealed non-volatile WORM behavior resulting from the highest dipole moment 5.45 D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: