Key result
Varenicline treatment in smokers resulted in a borderline significant prolongation of the PR interval (163.5 to 168.2 ms, p=0.053) but had no significant effect on heart rate, QT interval, or QT dispersion.
Why the study?
Does short-term varenicline therapy affect heart rate, atrioventricular conduction, and ventricular repolarization in adult smokers?
Observational (n=60)
Single-blind (outcome assessors)
No
Does short-term varenicline therapy affect heart rate, atrioventricular conduction, and ventricular repolarization in adult smokers?
Short-term varenicline therapy in healthy smokers does not significantly alter heart rate, QT interval, or QT dispersion, though it may cause a borderline prolongation of the PR interval.
Supports repolarization safety in healthy smokers; leaves open clinical relevance of borderline PR prolongation for larger trials.
The effects of varenicline, an effective drug for smoking cessation, on atrioventricular and ventricular conductance remain unknown. oBjeCTive: To evaluate the effects of varenicline on heart rate, PR interval, QT interval and QT dispersion (QTd). MeTHodS: A total of 60 smokers were prospectively enrolled in the present study. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram recordings were obtained for all subjects before and on the 15th day of drug administration. Electrocardiograms were recorded at an amplitude of 20 mm/mV and a sweep speed of 50 mm/s. ReSulTS: The mean ( SD) age of the volunteers was 3810 years. Thirtyfour (57%) were male. Fourteen (23%) had hypertension, eight (13%) had diabetes and six (10%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The mean heart rate was 74.713.3 beats/min, and mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures on admission were 122.314.3 mmHg and 76.510.2 mmHg, respectively. Heart rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures did not change with varenicline treatment. Varenicline treatment resulted in limited prolongation in PR interval, which appropached significance (163.518.3 ms versus 168.217.9 ms; P=0.053), while RR interval (796.3117.4 ms versus 798.3123.7 ms; P=0.926), QT interval (384.117.5 ms versus 383.420.9 ms; P=0.852) and QTd (52.614.9 ms versus 52.214.9 ms; P=0.919) were not significantly changed. ConCluSion: Varenicline had a limited effect on atrioventricular conduction, while it had no effect on heart rate, QT interval and QTd. Further studies are needed to prove the effects of varenicline on the conduction system of the heart, especially on PR interval.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KaraveliogAAlu et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Smoking (n=60). Varenicline vs. Baseline (pre-treatment) was evaluated on PR interval (p=0.053). Varenicline treatment in smokers resulted in a borderline significant prolongation of the PR interval (163.5 to 168.2 ms, p=0.053) but had no significant effect on heart rate, QT interval, or QT dispersion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: