Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a prominent interferon signature that upregulates apolipoprotein L1 ( APOL1 ) expression. High-risk APOL1 genotypes have been associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as a complication of lupus nephritis (LN); however, the strength and consistency of this association remain heterogeneous across studies. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the association between APOL1 genotypes and the odds of LN-associated kidney failure among patients with SLE. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science identified eligible observational studies, and pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using standard methods. Results Four observational studies comprising a total of 1,885 patients of African ancestry were included. Of these, 321 carried high-risk APOL1 genotypes and 1,564 carried low-risk genotypes. High-risk APOL1 genotypes were associated with significantly increased odds of LN-associated ESRD compared with low-risk genotypes (OR 2.66; 95% CI 1.63–4.32; p = 0.008), with low heterogeneity ( I 2 = 9.8%). Chronic kidney disease outcomes were reported heterogeneously and were summarized descriptively. Conclusion High-risk APOL1 genotypes are associated with significantly increased pooled odds of LN-associated ESRD among patients with SLE. These findings demonstrate that APOL1 is a clinically relevant genetic modifier of renal prognosis, supporting its potential role as a tool for risk stratification and precision medicine approaches in LN. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024587943 , identifier PROSPERO (CRD42024587943).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldana-Pérez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: