Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The oxidation and reduction of a redox-active aryl-substituted bis(imino)pyridine iron dicarbonyl has been explored to determine whether electron-transfer events are ligand- or metal-based or a combination of both. A series of bis(imino)pyridine iron dicarbonyl compounds, [((iPr)PDI)Fe(CO)(2)](-), ((iPr)PDI)Fe(CO)(2), and [((iPr)PDI)Fe(CO)(2)](+) [(iPr)PDI = 2,6-(2,6-(i)Pr(2)C(6)H(3)N═CMe)(2)C(5)H(3)N], which differ by three oxidation states, were prepared and the electronic structures evaluated using a combination of spectroscopic techniques and, in two cases, [((iPr)PDI)Fe(CO)(2)](+) and [((iPr)PDI)Fe(CO)(2)], metrical parameters from X-ray diffraction. The data establish that the cationic iron dicarbonyl complex is best described as a low-spin iron(I) compound (S(Fe) = ½) with a neutral bis(imino)pyridine chelate. The anionic iron dicarbonyl, [((iPr)PDI)Fe(CO)(2)](-), is also best described as an iron(I) compound but with a two-electron-reduced bis(imino)pyridine. The covalency of the neutral compound, ((iPr)PDI)Fe(CO)(2), suggests that both the oxidative and reductive events are not ligand- or metal-localized but a result of the cooperativity of both entities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tondreau et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: