Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reaction between [Ru(salen)(PPh3)Cl] and the 4-pyridyl-substituted nitronyl nitroxide radical (NITpPy) leads to the [Ru(salen)(PPh3)(NITpPy)](ClO4)(H2O)2 complex while the reaction with the azido anion (N3-) leads to the [Ru(salen)(PPh3)(N3)] complex 2 (where salen2- = N,N'-ethan-1,2-diylbis(salicylidenamine) and PPh3 = triphenylphosphine). Both compounds have been characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The two crystal structures are composed by a [Ru(III)(salen)(PPh3)]+ unit where the Ru(III) ion is coordinated to a salen2- ligand and one PPh3 ligand in axial position. In 1 the Ru(III) ion is coordinated to the 4-pyridyl-substituted nitronyl nitroxide radical whereas in 2 the second axial position is occupied by the azido ligand. In both complexes the Ru(III) ions are in the same environment RuO2N3P, in a tetragonally elongated octhaedral geometry. The crystal packing of 1 reveals pi-stacking in pairs. While antiferromagnetic intermolecular interaction (J2 = 5.0 cm(-1)) dominates at low temperatures, ferromagnetic intramolecular interaction (J1 = -9.0 cm(-1)) have been found between the Ru(III) ion and the coordinated NITpPy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pointillart et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: