Analytical solutions to the cloud charge screening-layer model of Brown et al. are obtained for planar, cylindrical, and spherical cloud geometries. Two specifications of the negative ion concentration n− at the surface of a positively charged cloud, representing upper and lower approximations to the actual supply of ions, are employed: (1) n− = n0 = constant, and (2) n− decays with time t approximately as (1 + αt)−1, where α is constant. The latter form for n− comes from a model that allows for space charge divergence outside the cloud but ignores ionization and recombination. In mksa units the maximum (saturation) space charge is found to be (4/e2) (ε0E0/λ0), where e = 2.718 …, ε0 is the permittivity of air, E0 is the initial cloud electric field, and λ0 is the mean free path of ions in an uncharged cloud (typically, λ0 = 10 meters). The surface electric field when the cloud particles first become saturated is E0/e2, and the final depth of the saturated layer is λ0/4. If the relaxation time of the surface electric field for the first case is τ (typically 40 sec), then the relaxation time for the second case is 1.94 τ. The screening-layer formation time (i.e., the time required for the surface screening-layer charge density to be within e−1 of its saturation value) is 0.49 τ in the first case and 0.67 τ in the second. Brown et al. obtained numerical solutions for the field and screening charge density as a function of time and depth for the special case of a flat layer cloud with n− = n0 at the surface. The agreement between their results and ours for these same conditions is excellent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James D. Klett (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: