Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The catalytic behavior of “Mo 8 O 23 ”, a sample composed mainly of Mo 8 O 23, was investigated in the oxidation of isobutene to methacrolein and compared to that of fully oxidized MoO 3 . “Mo 8 O 23 ” was initially more active and selective than MoO 3 but exhibited a deactivation with time-on-stream. Conversely, when used in a physical mixture with α-Sb 2 O 4, the catalytic performance of “Mo 8 O 23 ” progressively increased. In both cases, the bulk of “Mo 8 O 23 ” was reoxidized to MoO 3 after the catalytic reaction. However, after being catalytically tested alone, the surface of “Mo 8 O 23 ” was more reduced compared to that of the fresh material, whereas it was more oxidized, with a stoichiometry likely corresponding to Mo 18 O 52, when reacted in the presence of α-Sb 2 O 4 . The results indicate that the shear structures in the bulk of the molybdenum suboxides are not necessarily the origin of the high levels of catalytic performance observed for molybdenum oxide-containing oxidation catalysts. The results also show that the key to maintaining high catalytic performance is to stabilize the surface of the molybdenum oxide in a stoichiometry close to Mo 18 O 52 . Under our reaction conditions, this happened only when α-Sb 2 O 4 was present. The role of α-Sb 2 O 4 is to irrigate the catalyst with spillover oxygen, which facilitates the reoxidation of the surface of “Mo 8 O 23 ” after incorporation of its oxygen atoms in oxidation products. Because of the spillover oxygen, the structure of the “Mo 8 O 23 ” stabilized during the reaction in the presence of α-Sb 2 O 4 is identical to that obtained when using MoO 3 under the same conditions, namely in mixture with α-Sb 2 O 4 . In the presence of spillover oxygen, the steady-state molybdenum oxide catalyst is composed of a core of MoO 3 and a superficial layer possessing the stoichiometry of Mo 18 O 52 . These findings confirm predictions made by the remote control theory about the dynamics of oxides “at work” in the presence of spillover oxygen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaigneaux et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: