Silver molybdate (Ag 2 MoO 4 ) and silver tungstate (Ag 2 WO 4 ) nanomaterials were prepared using two complementary methods, microwave assisted hydrothermal synthesis (MAH) (pH 7, 140 °C) and co-precipitation (pH 4, 70 °C), and were then used to prepare two core/shell composites, namely α-Ag 2 WO 4 / β-Ag 2 MoO 4 (MAH, pH 4, 140 °C) and β-Ag 2 MoO 4 / β-Ag 2 WO 4 (co-precipitation, pH 4, 70 °C). The shape and size of the microcrystals were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), different morphologies such as balls and nanorods. These powders were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction and UV-vis (diffuse reflectance and photoluminescence). X-ray diffraction patterns showed that the Ag 2 MoO 4 samples obtained by the two methods were single-phased and belonged to the β-Ag 2 MoO 4 structure (spinel type). In contrast, the Ag 2 WO 4 obtained in the two syntheses were structurally different: MAH exhibited the well-known tetrameric stable structure β-Ag 2 WO 4 , while co-precipitation afforded the metastable β-Ag 2 WO 4 allotrope, coexisting with a weak amount of the α;-phase. The optical gap of β-Ag 2 WO 4 (3.3 eV) was evaluated for the first time. In contrast to β-Ag 2 MoO 4 / β-Ag 2 WO 4 , the α-Ag 2 WO 4 / β-Ag 2 MoO 4 exhibited strongly-enhanced photoluminescence in the low-energy band (650 nm), tentatively explained by the creation of a large density of local defects (distortions) at the core-shell interface, due to the presence of two different types of MOx polyhedra in the two structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santana et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: