Key result
Among patients implanted with a remote monitoring-capable spinal cord stimulation system, 95.1% remained implanted at a median of 364 days, with 96.8% actively using the therapy.
Why the study?
Spinal cord stimulation implant status and postimplant therapeutic utilization have historically been poorly monitored with limited outcomes reported, largely due to limitations of legacy technology and clinic-based data collection.
What are the rates of real-world therapy utilization, explant, and virtual explant in patients implanted with a remote monitoring-capable spinal cord stimulation system?
Cohort (n=493)
What are the rates of real-world therapy utilization, explant, and virtual explant in patients implanted with a remote monitoring-capable spinal cord stimulation system?
Remote monitoring of spinal cord stimulation systems demonstrates high rates of active device usage (96.8%) and low explant rates (4.9%) at approximately 1 year, allowing for accurate tracking of device utilization and virtual explants.
Remote monitoring reveals high real-world SCS utilization and low explant rates; leaves open whether prospective trials confirm outcome benefits.
OBJECTIVES: Recent advancements in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technologies have focused on improving device performance and therapeutic effectiveness. However, SCS implant status and postimplant therapeutic utilization have historically been poorly monitored, with limited outcomes reported, primarily owing to inherent limitations of legacy technology and clinic-based data collection. The recent emergence of SCS remote monitoring enables daily, objective tracking of device use, establishing reliable longitudinal data integrity. This advancement supports a new standard for long-term surveillance of SCS implant status and therapy utilization and enables benchmarking against previously reported estimates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional review board exemption, deidentified data were extracted from a manufacturer database for the first 500 consecutive US patients implanted with a remote monitoring-capable SCS system to retrospectively analyze rates of real-world SCS therapy utilization, explant, and virtual explant. RESULTS: In total, 493 patients met the eligibility criteria, with a median age of 67 years; 58.8% were female. At a median SCS implant duration of 364 days, 95.1% remained implanted, whereas 4.9% were explanted. The most common reason for explant was surgical complications, including infection and pocket-site pain. Among patients implanted, 96.8% were actively using SCS; 2.3% were not actively using SCS, and 0.9% were considered virtual explants owing to prolonged SCS inactivity. CONCLUSIONS: Automated SCS remote monitoring offers targeted enhancements to therapeutic care and may support longitudinal accountability and data integrity through daily transmission of objective device data. Unlike traditional methods for assessing device explant, which underestimate SCS discontinuation rates, real-time monitoring enables first-of-its-kind detection of inactive users and virtual explants for a more comprehensive assessment of real-world outcomes. The high rate of SCS usage in these results indicates the potential value of remote care and provides support for the adoption of remote monitoring as a new standard for postimplant device management and long-term surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pope et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Spinal cord stimulation (n=493). Remote monitoring-capable spinal cord stimulation (SCS) system was evaluated on Rates of real-world SCS therapy utilization, explant, and virtual explant. Among patients implanted with a remote monitoring-capable spinal cord stimulation system, 95.1% remained implanted at a median of 364 days, with 96.8% actively using the therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: