Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Human infection with Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas' disease) is usually accompanied by humoral and cellular immune responses to GP57/51, a major antigen that was recently identified as a prominent cysteinyl proteinase (cruzipain). The PBMC responses of 11 chronic chagasic patients and the properties of anti-cruzipain T cell lines are reported herein. GP57/51, isolated from Y strain epimastigotes (n-cruzipain) or the recombinant protein expressed in E. coli (r-cruzipain), elicited proliferative responses of variable intensity from the patient's PBMC. T cell lines were then generated using each of these antigens. These lines, which always carried the CD4+ phenotype, were reciprocally stimulated by n-cruzipain or r-cruzipain, the responses to the former being usually stronger. The analysis of cytokine production suggested that Th1-like subsets dominate the patient's responses: IFN-gamma was consistently induced on stimulation with either n-cruzipain or r-cruzipain. In contrast, IL-4 was present in very small concentrations or was undetectable. We then sought to define T cell epitopes of cruzipain using synthetic peptides spanning portions of the central (catalytic) domain and COOH-terminal extension. From a panel of 11 peptides, only one 33 mer peptide (P214) elicited a strong proliferative response on anti-cruzipain T cell lines, the intensity being comparable to that induced by r-cruzipain. Conversely, T cell lines started with P214 were responsive to either n-cruzipain or r-cruzipain, the proliferative responses again being accompanied by IFN-gamma production, but not IL-4. Interestingly, P214 is located in a conserved region of the catalytic domain of cruzipain, hence may propitiate opportunities for cross-recognition of other members of the papain superfamily. Fine epitope mapping should reveal whether structurally similar regions of host thiol-cathepsins can be potential targets for cross-reactive T cell responses during chronic human infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnholdt et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: