Key result
CCTA percent aggregate plaque volume improves ischemia detection over diameter stenosis, boosting AUC to 0.85.
Why the study?
Does percent aggregate plaque volume (%APV) by coronary CTA improve the identification of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity compared to standard luminal narrowing measures?
Observational (n=58)
Does percent aggregate plaque volume (%APV) by coronary CTA improve the identification of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity compared to standard luminal narrowing measures?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.85
Percent aggregate plaque volume by coronary CTA provides superior diagnostic accuracy and reclassification for identifying ischemia in intermediate coronary lesions compared to standard luminal narrowing measures.
OBJECTIVES This study examined the performance of percent aggregate plaque volume (%APV), which represents cumulative plaque volume as a function of total vessel volume, by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) for identification of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity. BACKGROUND Coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis demonstrate significant rates of ischemia. Coronary CTA enables quantification of luminal narrowing and %APV. METHODS We identified 58 patients with intermediate lesions (30% to 69% diameter stenosis) who underwent invasive angiography and fractional flow reserve. Coronary CTA measures included diameter stenosis, area stenosis, minimal lumen diameter (MLD), minimal lumen area (MLA) and %APV. %APV was defined as the sum of plaque volume divided by the sum of vessel volume from the ostium to the distal portion of the lesion. Fractional flow reserve ≤ 0.80 was considered diagnostic of lesion-specific ischemia. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were also evaluated. RESULTS Twenty-two of 58 lesions (38%) caused ischemia. Compared with nonischemic lesions, ischemic lesions had smaller MLD (1.3 vs. 1.7 mm, p = 0.01), smaller MLA (2.5 vs. 3.8 mm(2), p = 0.01), and greater %APV (48.9% vs. 39.3%, p < 0.0001). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was highest for %APV (0.85) compared with diameter stenosis (0.68), area stenosis (0.66), MLD (0.75), or MLA (0.78). Addition of %APV to other measures showed significant reclassification over diameter stenosis (NRI 0.77, p < 0.001), area stenosis (NRI 0.63, p = 0.002), MLD (NRI 0.62, p = 0.001), and MLA (NRI 0.43, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Compared with diameter stenosis, area stenosis, MLD, and MLA, %APV by coronary CTA improves identification, discrimination, and reclassification of ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakazato et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Ischemic lesions of intermediate stenosis severity (n=58). Percent aggregate plaque volume (%APV) by coronary CTA vs. Diameter stenosis, area stenosis, minimal lumen diameter, and minimal lumen area was evaluated on Diagnosis of lesion-specific ischemia (fractional flow reserve ≤ 0.80) (AUC 0.85). Percent aggregate plaque volume by coronary CTA improved identification of ischemic lesions compared with diameter stenosis (AUC 0.85 vs 0.68) and reclassification (NRI 0.77, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: