Key result
Etanercept treatment for 6 months in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis did not significantly alter diastolic dysfunction (37.5% at baseline vs 31.25% at 6 months, P=0.164).
Why the study?
Does etanercept affect cardiac functions and lipid profile in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis?
Cohort (n=16)
Does etanercept affect cardiac functions and lipid profile in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis?
Etanercept treatment for 6 months in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis is safe regarding cardiac function and lipid profiles, without causing significant changes in LVEF or diastolic dysfunction.
Etanercept may support short-term cardiac safety in active RA; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are known to be at increased cardiovascular risk. Etanercept is a tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) blocking agent that has been successfully used in the treatment of RA. We sought to assess the effects of etanercept on cardiac functions and lipid profile in RA patients without overt cardiac disease. METHODS: Sixteen patients with active RA were recruited to the study prospectively. Etanercept was administered subcutaneously twice a week for 6 months. Clinical and laboratory predictors of RA activity and lipid profile were evaluated at baseline and at 6 months. The systolic and diastolic function parameters of the left ventricle were obtained by echocardiographic examination and included mitral inflow Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (13 women; median age, 48 years [range, 27-69 years]) completed the study. Patients' 28-item Disease Activity Score and Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were significantly reduced by treatment (6.35 to 4.45 [P < 0.001] and 2.0 to 0.75 [P = 0.005], respectively). Diastolic dysfunction was detected in 6 patients (37.5%) (3 in grade 1 and 3 in grade 2) by mitral inflow Doppler and the tissue Doppler parameters before the treatment. No significant change in diastolic dysfunction was observed during follow-up (6/16 to 5/16, P = 0.164). In addition, there were also no significant differences in the left ventricular ejection fraction (65.8-66.9, P = 0.168) and lipid profiles after 6 months of etanercept treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept treatment was safe for use as regards cardiac functions and lipid profiles and effective on RA parameters during 6-month follow-up in patients with active RA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şenel et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in active rheumatoid arthritis (n=16). Etanercept vs. Baseline was evaluated on diastolic dysfunction (p=0.164). Etanercept treatment for 6 months in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis did not significantly alter diastolic dysfunction (37.5% at baseline vs 31.25% at 6 months, P=0.164).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: