Key result
Children with LQT single nucleotide polymorphisms exhibited longer QTc intervals at rest, peak exercise, and recovery compared to normal controls, though both groups showed normal QTc adaptation to exercise.
Why the study?
Does the presence of LQT single nucleotide polymorphisms alter QTc intervals at rest and during exercise stress testing in pediatric patients?
Case-Control (n=148)
Single-blind (ECG measurements blinded to LQTS status)
No
Does the presence of LQT single nucleotide polymorphisms alter QTc intervals at rest and during exercise stress testing in pediatric patients?
Pediatric patients with LQT single nucleotide polymorphisms exhibit longer QTc intervals at rest and during exercise stress testing compared to normal controls, though their QTc adaptation response to exercise remains normal.
BACKGROUND: The impact of harboring, genetic variants or single nucleotide polymorphisms (LQT-PM) on the repolarization response during exercise and recovery is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the QTc interval adaptation during exercise stress testing (EST) in children with LQT polymorphisms compared to a group of age and gender matched normal controls. METHODS: One hundred forty-eight patients were age and gender matched into two groups: LQT-PM and control. Each patient underwent a uniform exercise protocol employing a cycle ergometer followed by a 9 minute recovery phase with continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Intervals (RR, QT and QTc) at rest (supine), peak exercise and in recovery (1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 minutes) were measured. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were positive for LQT-PM and the control group consisted of 105 patients. A total of 83 SNPs were identified: SCN5A n = 31 (37%), KCNE1 n = 29 (35%), KCNH2 n = 20 (24%), KCNQ1 n = 2 (2%) and KCNE2 n = 1 (1%). The QTc interval measurements of the LQT-PM were longer at rest, peak exercise and all phases of recovery when compared to the control group. Neither group demonstrated abnormal QTc interval adaptation in response to exercise. Patients with homozygous SNPs had longer resting QTc intervals when compared to patients with only heterozygous SNPs (435 ± 23 ms vs. 415 ± 20 ms, respectively, P value <0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with LQT-PM may have longer QTc intervals at rest as well as at peak exercise and all phases of the recovery period compared to normal controls. Additionally, subjects with homozygous SNPs had longer resting QTc intervals when compared to those with only heterozygous SNPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aziz et al. (2013) conducted a case-control in Suspected Long QT Syndrome (n=148). LQT single nucleotide polymorphisms (LQT-PM) vs. Age and gender-matched normal controls was evaluated on Resting QTc interval (ms). Children with LQT single nucleotide polymorphisms exhibited longer QTc intervals at rest, peak exercise, and recovery compared to normal controls, though both groups showed normal QTc adaptation to exercise.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: