Nucleogenic neon isotope production resulting from α decay of naturally occurring U and Th was calculated for typical compositions of the mantle and crust using a simple non‐Monte Carlo code for neutron transport. The (α,n), (α,p), and (n, α) reactions, leading to the production of neon isotopes in the outgoing reaction channel, are taken into account in the calculations. In the first stage of calculation, neon production from (α,n) and (α,p)reactions on 17 O, 18 O, and 19 F is considered, and the neutron energy spectrum from (α,n) reactions on the major elements is derived. This spectrum is further used for calculation of the neon isotope yield from the reactions 24 Mg (n,α) 21 Ne, 25 Mg(n,α) 22 Ne, and 23 Na(n,α) 20 Ne. The calculated production of nucleogenic neon is dominated by (α,n) reactions with oxygen in the Earth's mantle and crust. The present calculations give 21 Ne/ 4 He production ratios that are approximately half those of the previous estimates by Rison [1980] and Kyser and Rison [1982]. The present study also has shown that the nucleogenic 21 Ne production from the 24 Mg(n,α) reaction is only about one‐fifth the previous estimate. The contribution of nucleogenic 21 Ne from the 24 Mg(n,α) reaction is insignificant compared with nucleogenic 21 Ne production from 18 O(α,n). Our estimate of the nucleogenic 21 Ne/radiogenic 4 He production ratio both in the mantle and in the crust is 4.5×10 −8 . This production ratio is quite consistent with nucleogenic 21 Ne/radiogenic 4 He ratios actually observed in crustal fluid samples ((4.6±0.8) ×10 −8 ). The error in calculation of the nucleogenic neon production, resulting from a random statistical variation of the entry neutron yields and cross sections, is estimated to be less than 5%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yatsevich et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: