The authors thank Dr. Sangster for his useful comments on their paper. At the time of preparation of the paper it was not known to the authors that there was an unfortunate printing error in reproduction of eq. (34) of [2].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pandharipande et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: