Key result
Intramural point stimulation in the in vivo pig left ventricle showed that passive and active potentials spread preferentially in the laminar direction (anisotropy ratio ~1.6:1).
This study demonstrates preferential transmural conduction in the laminar direction in the pig LV, suggesting limitations in inferring intramural electrical events solely from endocardial potentials.
Endocardial potentials may miss initial intramural spread due to laminar anisotropy; leaves open translation to human mapping and ablation.
INTRODUCTION: Extracellular potentials measured on the heart surfaces are used to infer events that originate deep within the heart wall. We have reconstructed intramural potentials in three dimensions for the first time, and compare these with epicardial and endocardial surface potentials and cardiac microstructure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Extracellular potentials from intramural point stimulation were measured from a high density 3-D electrode array in the in vivo pig LV. MR and extended volume imaging were used to register electrode locations and characterize fiber and laminar orientations throughout the recording volume. Measured potentials were compared with predictions of tissue-specific bidomain computer activation models. Positive potentials recorded in the LV wall preceded the depolarization wavefront as it spread in the fiber direction. Transverse to this, passive and active potentials spread preferentially in the laminar direction (anisotropy ratio ∼1.6:1). Epicardial surface potentials reflect initial intramural propagation at the stimulus location, but endocardial potentials do not, particularly adjacent to papillary muscles. Measured 3-D potentials were consistently better captured by computer models that incorporate three distinct conductivities aligned with local microstructural axes, but the preferential spread of potentials in the laminar direction was not fully predicted. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for preferential transmural conduction and raises questions about the extent to which intramural electrical events can be inferred from endocardial potentials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caldwell et al. (2017) studied this question. Intramural point stimulation was evaluated on Extracellular potentials and preferential transmural conduction. Intramural point stimulation in the in vivo pig left ventricle showed that passive and active potentials spread preferentially in the laminar direction (anisotropy ratio ~1.6:1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: