BACKGROUND: The childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) is a validated symptom score for assessing asthma control in children. We used a slightly modified version (C-ACT(M) ) of the German C-ACT and compared our results with the literature, correlated the children's part of C-ACT (C-ACT(children) ) with a visual analogue scale (VAS(children) ), explored the agreement between C-ACT(M) and GINA levels of asthma control, as well as the relationship between C-ACT(M) and lung function and exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). METHODS: We investigated 107 children with a diagnosis of asthma. The study protocol consisted of a clinical examination, assessment of asthma control according to GINA guidelines, administration of C-ACT(M) , VAS(children) , lung function, and FeNO. RESULTS: Of our patients 66% had, according to GINA, partly controlled-/uncontrolled asthma, 18% were uncontrolled according to C-ACT(M) . Children with partly controlled-/uncontrolled asthma according to GINA had lower C-ACT(M) scores than did children with controlled asthma (16.1 ± 3.6 SD vs. 25.4 ± 1.8 SD; P < 0.000), and children with a C-ACT(M) score ≤ 19 had poorer lung function (mean FEV1% predicted 81.5 ± 13.5 SD vs. 94.2 ± 12.1 SD; P = 0.002). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients revealed significant correlations between all symptom scores. Multiple linear regression adjusted for age, gender, FEV1 and FeNO demonstrated a significant relationship between C-ACT(M) , VAS(children) , and FEV1 (P = 0.003, resp. <0.000), but no significant correlation between C-ACT(M) , VAS(children) , and FeNO. CONCLUSIONS: The German version of C-ACT(M) is valid and useful for monitoring children with asthma along with tests aimed to follow up lung function and airway inflammation. Concordance between C-ACT(M) and GINA is moderate, because asthma control assessed by C-ACT(M) allows more symptoms and lung function is not included in the scoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waibel et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: