Key result
Automated border detection using acoustic quantification showed good agreement for area measurements and fair agreement for function measurements compared to off-line hand-digitization in children.
Observational
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and accuracy of automated border detection using acoustic quantification in children. BACKGROUND: Acoustic quantification has shown promise in adult patients as a method for on-line estimation of left ventricular size and function. However, in children, the smaller ventricular size might magnify the importance of measurement error. METHODS: We compared the cross-sectional area and fractional area change of the left ventricle as measured on line by acoustic quantification with the area and fractional area change derived by hand-digitizing the endocardial border of the left ventricle off line, both with and without the papillary muscles included in the left ventricular cavity. RESULTS: The areas and area change fractions from the two methods were highly correlated, both with inclusion and exclusion of the papillary muscles for off-line analysis. However, the regression slope was closer to unity when the papillary muscles were excluded from the left ventricular cavity during off-line digitization of the endocardial border. Analysis of agreement between the two methods showed good agreement for area measurements and fair agreement for function measurements. The magnitude of the difference between the two methods for area measurement was directly proportional to the size of the ventricle. That is, the larger the ventricle the larger the difference between the area measurements by the two methods. DISCUSSION: Automatic border detection using acoustic quantification appears to be an acceptable method for estimating the cross-sectional area and fractional area change of the left ventricle in children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rein et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Children requiring left ventricular size and function estimation. Automated border detection using acoustic quantification vs. Hand-digitizing the endocardial border off line was evaluated on Cross-sectional area and fractional area change of the left ventricle. Automated border detection using acoustic quantification showed good agreement for area measurements and fair agreement for function measurements compared to off-line hand-digitization in children.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: