Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cu 1.8 S has been considered as a potential thermoelectric (TE) material for its stable electrical and thermal properties, environmental benignity, and low cost. Herein, the TE properties of nanostructured Cu 1.8 S 1− x Te x (0 ⩽ x ⩽ 0.2) bulks fabricated by a facile process combining mechanical alloying (MA) and room-temperature high-pressure sintering (RT-HPS) technique were optimized via eliminating the volatilization of S element and suppressing grain growth. Experimentally, a single phase of Cu 1.8 S was obtained at x = 0, and a second Cu 1.96 S phase formed in all Cu 1.8 S 1− x Te x samples when 0.05 ⩽ x ⩽ 0.125. With further increasing x to 0.15 ⩽ x ⩽ 0.2, the Cu 2− z Te phase was detected and the samples consisted of Cu 1.8 S, Cu 1.96 S, and Cu 2− z Te phases. Benefiting from a modified band structure and the coexisted phases of Cu 1.96 S and Cu 2− z Te, the power factor is enhanced in all Cu 1.8 S 1− x Te x (0.05 ⩽ x ⩽ 0.2) alloys. Combining with a drastic decrease in the thermal conductivity due to the strengthened phonon scatterings from multiscale defects introduced by Te doping and nano-grain boundaries, a maximum figure of merit ( ZT ) of 0.352 is reached at 623 K for Cu 1.8 S 0.875 Te 0.125 , which is 171% higher than that of Cu 1.8 S (0.130). The study demonstrates that doping Te is an effective strategy to improve the TE performance of Cu 1.8 S based materials and the proposed facile method combing MA and RT-HPS is a potential way to fabricate nanostructured bulks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: