Key result
Ambulatory cardiology care within the first year after myocardial infarction was associated with a lower 18-month mortality rate compared to no cardiology care (6% vs 14%; P<0.000).
Why the study?
Does ambulatory cardiology care improve 18-month survival in patients with a new diagnosis of myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=158,494)
Yes
Does ambulatory cardiology care improve 18-month survival in patients with a new diagnosis of myocardial infarction?
Outpatient follow-up care by a cardiologist, particularly in combination with a general practitioner or internist, is associated with significantly lower 18-month mortality after myocardial infarction.
Background With a mortality rate above European average, myocardial infarction (MI) is the second most common cause of death in Germany. Data about post-MI ambulatory care and mortality is scarce. We examined the association between ambulatory treating physicians' specialty and the mortality of post-MI patients. Methods Medical claims data of all 17 German regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance physicians were analyzed, which cover approximately 90% of the German population. Patients with a new diagnosis of a MI in 2011 were divided into treatment groups with and without ambulant cardiology care within the first year after MI diagnosis. Propensity-score matching based on socio-demographic and clinical variables was performed to achieve comparability between groups. The 18-month mortality rate was derived employing a validated method. Results 158,494 patients with a new diagnosis of MI had received post-MI ambulatory care in 2011. Half of them (51%) had at least one ambulatory contact with a cardiologist within the first year. During a follow-up of 18months, the mortality rate before and after propensity-score matching was 19% and 14% in patients without cardiology care and 6%, respectively, in patients with cardiology care (χ 2 =666.7; P <0.000 after propensity adjustment). Patients who only saw a cardiologist and had no additional contact to an ambulant general practitioner (GP)/internist within the first year did not have increased survival rates. Conclusions Outpatient follow-up care by a cardiologist in combination with consultations of GP/internists within the first year may be of importance for the prognosis of MI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radzimanowski et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=158,494). Ambulant cardiology care within the first year vs. No ambulant cardiology care within the first year was evaluated on 18-month mortality rate (p=<0.000). Ambulatory cardiology care within the first year after myocardial infarction was associated with a lower 18-month mortality rate compared to no cardiology care (6% vs 14%; P<0.000).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: