Two‐phase composites consisting of LaPO 4 or CePO 4 and alumina, mullite, or zirconia were found to be machinable; i.e., they can be cut and drilled using conventional tungsten carbide metal‐working tools. Single‐phase LaPO 4 was also machinable. Measurements of drilling rates, grinding rates, and normal forces are used to compare the ease of machining in these materials and in a conventional machinable glass‐ceramic material, and to provide preliminary information on the relation between microstructure and machining properties. In Hertzian contact experiments these materials showed extensive nonlinear behavior associated with a damage zone beneath the contact site, similar to other machinable ceramics. Mechanisms of material removal are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: