Donor-stabilized bis(silylene)tungsten complexes CpW(CO) 2 {(SiMe 2 )···Do···(SiMe 2 )} (Cp = η-C 5 H 5; Do = NEt 2 ( 1 ), OMe ( 2 )) were synthesized by photolysis of a C 6 D 6 solution containing CpW(CO) 3 Me and HSiMe 2 SiMe 2 Do. The X-ray crystal structures of 1 and 2 revealed that the W−Si bonds (2.502(2) and 2.501(2) Å for 1; 2.490(3) Å for 2 ) are significantly shorter than those of structurally similar silyltungsten complexes, while the Si−N bonds (1.930(6) and 1.920(7) Å) in 1 and the Si−O bonds (1.792(7) Å) in 2 are much longer than usual Si−N and Si−O single bonds. These structural data indicate that the W−Si bonds bear partial double bond character, whereas the Si−N and Si−O bonds are regarded as a hybrid of covalent bonding and dative bonding. The unsaturated nature of the tungsten−silicon bonds is also indicated by the significant downfield shift of the 29 Si NMR signals as well as large coupling constants between 29 Si and 183 W ( 1 δ = 62.1 ppm, 1 J W - Si = 91.5 Hz; 2 δ = 99.3 ppm, 1 J W - Si = 99.3 Hz) compared to those of structurally similar silyltungsten complexes. The tungsten complexes 1 and 2 showed fluxional behavior due to silylene−methyl group exchange and, in the case of 1, N−Et group exchange. A mechanism containing the generation of a base-free silyl(silylene)tungsten complex as the key intermediate is proposed for the fluxional process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueno et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: