Objective:The main objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of an experimental propolis-based cement (EPC) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), both as apical plug, using the glucose leakage system.Thereafter, a bacterial leakage test was employed to evaluate the EPC sealing ability.Methods: For the glucose leakage test, 30 root segments (12 mm) were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n = 15), according to the cement used as apical plug, as follows: G1 = MTA; G2 = EPC.Root segments were prepared and the amount of glucose leakage was measured, following an enzymatic reaction, and quantified by a spectrophotometer.Data were analyzed by means of Student's t-test (p < 0.05).For the bacterial leakage test, another 15 teeth were subject to apexification procedures, filled with EPC and mounted in a specific apparatus.The number of leaking specimens was observed weekly for 70 days.Results: EPC was significantly superior to MTA (p < 0.001).The EPC sealing ability was 100% and 60% efficient in glucose and bacterial leakage tests, respectively.Conclusions: The experimental propolis-based cement used as apical plug promoted superior sealing ability when compared to MTA, and excellent performance in both leakage systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almeida et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: