Key result
Low-load aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction resulted in faster heart rate on-kinetics compared to high-load aerobic exercise (23.4 vs 42.0 seconds; p<0.01).
Why the study?
The study aimed to verify the on and off heart rate and heart rate variability kinetics during high-load aerobic exercise versus low-load aerobic exercise with and without blood flow restriction.
Does low-load aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction alter heart rate and heart rate variability kinetics compared to low-load exercise without restriction or high-load exercise in healthy males?
RCT (n=14)
Randomly assigned
Does low-load aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction alter heart rate and heart rate variability kinetics compared to low-load exercise without restriction or high-load exercise in healthy males?
Low-load aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction promotes faster cardiac adjustments and better heart rate variability recovery compared to high-load aerobic exercise.
May support low-load blood flow restriction training for efficient cardiac responses in healthy adults; extends BFR evidence to heart rate kinetics.
Aim: To verify the on and off heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV) kinetics during a high-load aerobic exercise and a low-load aerobic exercise, with and without blood flow restriction (BFR). Methods: Fourteen healthy male subjects performed three randomly assigned experimental sessions: 1) 10 minutes walking at 40% of maximal aerobic speed (MAS) (40LL); 2) 10 minutes walking at 40% of MAS with BFR (40LL+BFR); and 3) 10 minutes running at 70% of MAS (70HL). The HR and HRV measurements were taken at rest, during exercise and the recovery period after constant load sessions. Results: The HR on- and off- kinetics, and HRV on-kinetics were faster in 40LL than in 40LL +BFR and 70HL (p < 0.05). The time constant (τon) of HR on-kinetics was faster in 40LL+BFR than in 70HL (23.4 ± 9.5 s vs 42 ± 9.5 s, respectively, p < 0.01), and was accompanied by faster HRV on-kinetics (12.4 ± 9.6 s vs 20.3 ± 13.7 s, respectively, p < 0.01). Although HR off-kinetics was not different between 40LL+BFR and 70HL, the recovery of time and frequency HRV indices were delayed in 70HL when compared to 40LL and 40LL+BFR (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings indicate that 40LL promoted faster cardiac adjustments compared to 40LL+BFR and 70HL sessions. Additionally, 40LL+BFR promoted faster cardiac adjustment and better HRV recovery compared to the 70HL session.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schamne et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Healthy (n=14). Low-load aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction (40LL+BFR) vs. Low-load aerobic exercise without BFR (40LL) and high-load aerobic exercise (70HL) was evaluated on Time constant (τon) of HR on-kinetics (p=< 0.01). Low-load aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction resulted in faster heart rate on-kinetics compared to high-load aerobic exercise (23.4 vs 42.0 seconds; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: