Key result
The use of ultrasound contrast agent during transoesophageal echocardiography impacted the subsequent treatment strategy in 13.0% of examinations (p<0.01).
Why the study?
Routine transoesophageal echocardiography to rule out left atrial appendage thrombi before interventions in atrial fibrillation can yield inconclusive results.
Does the use of ultrasound contrast agent during transoesophageal echocardiography improve the detection of left atrial appendage thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational
Does the use of ultrasound contrast agent during transoesophageal echocardiography improve the detection of left atrial appendage thrombi in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The use of ultrasound contrast agents during transoesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation significantly improves diagnostic certainty and impacts clinical management by better ruling out left atrial appendage thrombi.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) carries the risk of thrombus formation in the left atrium and especially in the left atrial appendage (LAA). A transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is routinely performed in these patients to rule out thrombi before cardioversion or structural interventions like LAA closure or pulmonary vein isolation. However, in a certain number of cases, inconclusive results of the TOE may result. This study was performed to analyse whether the routine use of ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) has an influence on the frequency of thrombus detection. Methods: In patients with AF who were scheduled for a subsequent interventional procedure, a TOE was initially performed without contrast agent. Then, the TOE was repeated with the use of UCA. The percentage of diagnostic findings regarding the prevalence of thrombus in the LAA with and without UCA were compared (thrombus present (T+), no thrombus (T-) and inconclusive result (T+/-)). Results: : p<0.01). In 29 examinations (13.0%), the use of UCA had an impact on the subsequent treatment strategy. Conclusions: The use of UCA during TOE in patients with AF has a significant impact on the subsequent patient management especially due to an improved rule out of LAA thrombi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebelt et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation. Ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) vs. Transoesophageal echocardiography without contrast agent was evaluated on Percentage of diagnostic findings regarding the prevalence of thrombus in the left atrial appendage (p=<0.01). The use of ultrasound contrast agent during transoesophageal echocardiography impacted the subsequent treatment strategy in 13.0% of examinations (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: