Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adsorption of CO 2 and CH 4 has been measured on the Na-, K-, and Cs-forms of zeolite Rho (0–9 bar; 283–333 K). Although CH 4 is excluded, CO 2 is readily taken up, although the uptake at low pressures decreases strongly, in the order Na + > K + > Cs + . Structural studies by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) suggest that cations in intercage window sites block CH 4 adsorption; however, in the presence of CO 2, the cations can move enough to permit adsorption (several angstroms). Determination of time-averaged cation positions during CO 2 adsorption at 298 K by Rietveld refinement against PXRD data shows that (i) in Na-Rho, there is a small relaxation of Na + cations within single eight-ring (S8R) sites, (ii) in Cs-Rho, D8R cations move to S8R sites (remaining within windows) and two phases of Cs-Rho ( I 4̅3 m, Im 3̅ m ) are present over a wide pressure range, and (iii) in K-Rho, there is relocation of some K + cations from window sites to cage sites and two phases coexist, each with I 4̅3 m symmetry, over the pressure range of 0–1 bar. The final cation distributions at high P CO 2 are similar for Na-, K-, and Cs-Rho, and adsorption in each case is only possible by “trapdoor”-type cation gating. Complementary studies on K-chabazite (Si/Al = 3) also show changes in time-averaged cation location during CO 2 adsorption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Łozińska et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: