Key result
A peak graded exercise stress test reduced ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 3.2 mmHg versus control (p<0.05), with resting heart rate variability significantly predicting this response.
Why the study?
Data were scarce regarding the relationship between postexercise hypotension and heart rate variability before and after aerobic exercise training in adults with hypertension.
Does resting heart rate variability predict postexercise hypotension before and after a 12-week aerobic training program in adults with hypertension?
Does resting heart rate variability predict postexercise hypotension before and after a 12-week aerobic training program in adults with hypertension?
Mean Difference: 3.2
p-value: p=<0.05
Resting heart rate variability, specifically markers of parasympathetic suppression, may be an important determinant of postexercise hypotension in adults with hypertension, independent of training status.
Because data are scarce, we examined the relationship between postexercise hypotension (PEH) and heart rate variability (HRV) before and after aerobic exercise training among adults with hypertension. Participants completed a 12 w aerobic training program. Before and after training, they performed a peak graded exercise stress test (GEST) and nonexercise control (CONTROL) and were left attached to an ambulatory BP monitor. Prior to CONTROL, HRV was measured supine for 5 min using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The participants (n = 18) were middle-aged (52.1 ± 11.7 y) and 50% men with hypertension (131.7 ± 9.8/85.9 ± 8.5 mmHg) and obesity (30.0 ± 3.7 kg·m−2). Before training, ambulatory systolic BP (ASBP) and diastolic ABP (ADBP) decreased by 3.2 ± 2.1 mmHg and 2.5 ± 1.5 mmHg, respectively, from baseline after the GEST versus CONTROL (p < 0.05). After training, ASBP tended to decrease by 3.5 ± 2.2 mmHg (p = 0.055) and ADBP decreased by 1.7 ± 2.5 mmHg (p = 0.001) from baseline after the GEST versus CONTROL. Before training, HRV high frequency (HFms2) (β = −0.441), age (β = 0.568), and resting SBP (β = 0.504) accounted for 66.8% of the ASBP response (p = 0.001), whereas the low frequency (LF)/HF ratio (β = 0.516) and resting DBP (β = 0.277) accounted for 35.7% of the ADBP response (p = 0.037). After training, the standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) (β = −0.556), age (β = 0.506), and resting SBP (β = 0.259) accounted for 60.7% of the ASBP response (p = 0.004), whereas SDNN (β = −0.236) and resting DBP (β = 0.785) accounted for 58.5% of the ADBP response (p = 0.001). Our preliminary findings show that adults with hypertension and parasympathetic suppression (i.e., lower SDNN and HFms2 and higher LF/HF) may elicit PEH to the greatest degree independent of training status versus adults with parasympathetic predominance, suggesting that resting HRV may be an important determinant of PEH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cılhoroz et al. (2023) studied Hypertension and obesity (n=18). Peak graded exercise stress test (GEST) and 12-week aerobic training vs. Nonexercise control (CONTROL) was evaluated on Ambulatory systolic BP (ASBP) decrease from baseline after GEST versus CONTROL before training (MD 3.2, p=<0.05). A peak graded exercise stress test reduced ambulatory systolic blood pressure by 3.2 mmHg versus control (p<0.05), with resting heart rate variability significantly predicting this response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: