We investigate the relationship between the continuum enhancement and the hard X-ray (HXR) emission of a white-light flare on 2002 September 29. By reconstructing the RHESSI HXR images in the impulsive phase, we find two bright conjugate footpoints (FPs) on the two sides of the magnetic neutral line. Using the thick-target model and assuming a low-energy cutoff of 20 keV, the energy fluxes of nonthermal electron beams bombarding FPs A and B are estimated to be 1.0 × 10 10 and 0.8 × 10 10 ergs cm -2 s -1 , respectively. However, the continuum enhancement at the two FPs is not simply proportional to the electron beam flux. The continuum emission at FP B is relatively strong with a maximum enhancement of ~8% and correlates temporally well with the HXR profile; however, the continuum emission at FP A is less significant with an enhancement of only ~4%-5%, regardless of the relatively strong beam flux. By carefully inspecting the Hα line profiles, we ascribe such a contrast to different atmospheric conditions at the two FPs. The Hα line profile at FP B exhibits a relatively weak amplitude with a pronounced central reversal, while the profile at FP A is fairly strong without a visible central reversal. This indicates that in the early impulsive phase of the flare, the local atmosphere at FP A has been appreciably heated and the coronal pressure is high enough to prevent most high-energy electrons from penetrating into the deeper atmosphere; while at FP B, the atmosphere has not been fully heated, the electron beam can effectively heat the chromosphere and produce the observed continuum enhancement via the radiative back-warming effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2004 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: