Key result
Implementation of a stroke cart, parallel workflows, and primary use of conscious sedation significantly decreased in-room time to groin puncture by 21.3 minutes compared to standard workflow.
Why the study?
Does the implementation of a stroke cart, parallel workflows, and conscious sedation improve procedural time metrics in LVO stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
Observational (n=47)
No
Does the implementation of a stroke cart, parallel workflows, and conscious sedation improve procedural time metrics in LVO stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy?
Implementing a stroke cart, parallel workflows, and conscious sedation significantly reduces procedural times for mechanical thrombectomy in LVO stroke patients without compromising functional outcomes.
Workflow optimizations were associated with shorter thrombectomy times; leaves open outcome impact and need for prospective trials before adoption.
Purpose Earlier reperfusion of large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke improves functional outcomes. We hypothesize that use of a stroke cart in the angiography suite, containing all commonly used procedural equipment in a mechanical thrombectomy, combined with parallel staff workflows, and use of conscious sedation when possible, improve mechanical thrombectomy time metrics. Methods We identified 47 consecutive LVO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy at our center, retrospectively and prospectively from implementation of these three workflow changes (19 pre- and 28 post-). For each patient, last known normal, NIHSS, angiography suite in-room time, type of anesthesia, groin puncture time, on-clot time, recanalization time, LVO location, number of passes, device(s) used, mTICI score, and outcome (mRS) were recorded. Between-group comparisons of time metrics and multivariate regression were performed. Results Stroke cart, parallel workflows, and primary use of conscious sedation decreased in-room time to groin puncture (-21.3 min, p < 0.0001), in-room to on-clot time (-24.1 min, p = 0.001), and in-room to reperfusion time (-29.5 min, p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia were found to significantly increase in-room to on-clot time ( p = 0.01), in-room to reperfusion time ( p = 0.01), and groin puncture to on-clot time ( p = 0.05). The number of patients achieving a good outcome (mRS 0-2), however, did not significantly differ between the two groups (9/18 (47%) vs 14/28 (50%), p = 0.60). Conclusions Use of a stroke cart, parallel workflows by neurointerventionalists, technologists, and nursing staff, and use of conscious sedation may be useful to other institutions in efforts to improve procedural times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Settecase et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (n=47). Stroke cart, parallel workflows, and conscious sedation vs. Standard workflow was evaluated on In-room time to groin puncture (MD -21.3 min, p=<0.0001). Implementation of a stroke cart, parallel workflows, and primary use of conscious sedation significantly decreased in-room time to groin puncture by 21.3 minutes compared to standard workflow.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: