Key result
The integrated EEG-fNIRS vector-phase analysis achieved an average classification accuracy of 91.35% for hemodynamic response detection, outperforming SVM, CNN, DNN, and dual-threshold VPA.
Why the study?
BCI systems require an accurate and less complex architecture to control devices with enhanced accuracy, prompting development of a novel multimodal methodology for hemodynamic response detection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An integrated EEG-fNIRS vector-phase analysis improves the classification accuracy of hemodynamic response detection for brain-computer interfaces to 91.35%.
For BCI systems, it is important to have an accurate and less complex architecture to control a device with enhanced accuracy. In this paper, a novel methodology for more accurate detection of the hemodynamic response has been developed using a multimodal brain-computer interface (BCI). An integrated classifier has been developed for achieving better classification accuracy using two modalities. An integrated EEG-fNIRS-based vector-phase analysis (VPA) has been conducted. An open-source dataset collected at the Technische Universität Berlin, including simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals of 26 healthy participants during n-back tests, has been used for this research. Instrumental and physiological noise removal has been done using preprocessing techniques followed by individually detecting activity in both modalities. With resting state threshold circle, VPA has been used to detect a hemodynamic response in fNIRS signals, whereas phase plots for EEG signals have been constructed using Hilbert Transform to detect the activity in each trial. Multiple threshold circles are drawn in the vector plane, where each circle is drawn after task completion in each trial of EEG signal. Finally, both processes are integrated into one vector-phase plot to get combined detection of hemodynamic response for activity. Results of this study illustrate that the combined EEG-fNIRS VPA yields considerably higher average classification accuracy, that is 91.35%, as compared to other classifiers such as support vector machine (SVM), convolutional neural networks (CNN), deep neural networks (DNN) and VPA (with dual-threshold circles) with classification accuracies 82%, 89%, 87% and 86% respectively. Outcomes of this research demonstrate that improved classification performance can be feasibly achieved using multimodal VPA for EEG-fNIRS hybrid data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arif et al. (2021) studied Healthy (n=26). Integrated EEG-fNIRS-based vector-phase analysis (VPA) vs. SVM, CNN, DNN, and dual-threshold VPA was evaluated on Average classification accuracy. The integrated EEG-fNIRS vector-phase analysis achieved an average classification accuracy of 91.35% for hemodynamic response detection, outperforming SVM, CNN, DNN, and dual-threshold VPA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: