Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surfaces after chemical post-processing treatments of electron beam melting (EBM) produced Ti-6Al-4V have been studied. Targeted chemical treatment allowed the study of variation in surface quality with material removal depth. Characterization of surface and defect morphologies were made, comparing two chemical post-processing methods, Hirtisation® and chemical milling with different milling depths. Surface topography was characterized using white light interferometry and subsurface defect distribution was studied using X-ray computed tomography (XCT). The morphology of the surface at different milling depths was compared to the sub-surface information from XCT scans of the as-built material. Furthermore, Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) treated material was documented for comparison. Results show that post-processed surfaces contain a number of different defects of mixed morphology, position and origin. Post-processing deteriorates the surface quality with increased removal depth due to the presence of sub-surface defects. The position of sub-surface defects in relation to the material surface coincides with the depth at which contour-hatch interactions are likely to have occurred during the EBM building process. The distribution of this sub-surface defect population is anisotropic in the building (horizontal) plane and reasons for this are explored. Hirtisation® produces surfaces morphologically different from chemically milled surfaces. This difference was found to contribute to Hirtisation® producing surfaces with higher roughness (Sa) than chemically milled surfaces at comparable removal depth. HIP did remove all detectable sub-surface defects but microstructural artefacts indicating healed porosity were found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandell et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: