Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present work introduces a new sorbent, so-called PANI/MIL100(Fe), for removing Pb (II) and Cr (VI) from wastewater. The successful preparation of PANI/MIL100(Fe) was verified via Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) characterizations. This adsorptive material showed a microporous structure with surface area magnitudes of up to 261.29 m2/g, a total pore volume of 0.2124 cm3/g, and a pore size distribution of around 1.2 nm. The maximum adsorption capacities of PANI/MIL100(Fe) for Cr (VI) (pH = 2) and Pb (II) (pH = 6) were obtained as 72.37 and 81.76 mg/g, respectively. The isotherm modeling assessments illustrated that the sorption of Pb (II) and Cr (VI) was consistent with the Sips model (R2 > 0.99), while the adsorption kinetics were suited to a pseudo-second-order model (R2 > 0.95). Thermodynamic studies of both metal ions demonstrated the spontaneous and endothermic nature of the process. The reusability of the PANI/MIL100(Fe) indicated promising adsorption properties for Pb (II) and Cr (VI) up to three cycles. Moreover, the XRD and FT-IR spectroscopy results after adsorption/desorption showed excellent stability of the adsorbent and physisorption mechanism, wherein electrons were exchanged between the PANI/MIL-100(Fe) and Pb (II) and Cr (VI). Finally, the findings suggested that PANI/MIL100(Fe) can be considered an efficient and environmentally friendly adsorbent to remove Pb (II) and Cr (VI) from wastewater.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azizi et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: