No AccessJournal of UrologyEditorial1 May 2012The Impact of Collateral Damage on Urological Care Anthony J. Schaeffer Anthony J. SchaefferAnthony J. Schaeffer More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.009AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "The Impact of Collateral Damage on Urological Care." The Journal of Urology, 187(5), pp. 1527–1528 References 1 : Complications after prostate biopsy: data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol2011; 186: 1830. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol2008; 179: 1379. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin versus placebo for prophylaxis during transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology1998; 52: 552. Google Scholar 4 : Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate: a randomized controlled study. BJU Int2000; 85: 682. Google Scholar 5 : BJU Int2010; 106: 1017. Google Scholar 6 : Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of post-procedure infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol2012; 187: 1275. Link, Google Scholar © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 5May 2012Page: 1527-1528 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Anthony J. Schaeffer More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony J. Schaeffer (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: