Key result
In both catheter ablation and surgical cohorts, patients who maintained sinus rhythm at follow-up demonstrated significant improvements in tricuspid regurgitation grade and right ventricular remodeling compared to those with recurrent atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of different treatments in patients with atrial fibrillation-caused tricuspid regurgitation.
Does catheter ablation compared to surgical ablation and tricuspid valve repair improve outcomes in patients with moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation caused by long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=393)
Does catheter ablation compared to surgical ablation and tricuspid valve repair improve outcomes in patients with moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation caused by long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation?
Catheter ablation is a viable option for AF-induced moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation when tethering height is <6mm, but surgical ablation with valve repair yields better outcomes in patients with severe tethering (>=6mm).
Tethering height ≥6 mm may favor surgical over catheter ablation in AF-related TR; leaves open optimal strategy without randomized data.
Background This study aimed to describe the mid-term outcomes of different treatments in patients with atrial fibrillation caused tricuspid regurgitation. Methods A retrospective study of patients diagnosed as atrial fibrillation caused moderate-severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing ablation (n = 411) were reviewed. The surgical cohort (n = 114) underwent surgical ablation and tricuspid valve repair; the catheter cohort (n = 279) was selected from those patients who had catheter ablation. Results The estimated actuarial 5-year survival rates were 96.8% (95% CI: 92.95-97.78) and 92.0% (95% CI: 85.26-95.78) in the catheter and surgical cohort, respectively. Tethering height was showed as independent risk factors for recurrent atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation in both cohorts. A matched group analysis using propensity-matched was conducted after categorizing total patients by tethering height < 6mm and >= 6mm. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed in patients with tethering height < 6mm, there were no differences in survival from mortality, stroke, recurrent atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation between two groups. In patients with tethering height >= 6mm, there were significantly higher cumulative incidence of stroke (95% CI, 0.047–0.849; P = 0.029), recurrent atrial fibrillation (95% CI, 0.357–09738; P = 0.039) and tricuspid regurgitation (95% CI, 0.359–0.981; P = 0.042) in catheter group. Conclusions Atrial fibrillation caused tricuspid regurgitation resulted in less leaflets coaptation, which risk the recurrence of atrial fibrillation and tricuspid regurgitation. Patients whose tethering height was less than 6mm showed satisfying improvement in tricuspid regurgitation with the restoration of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation. However, in patients with severe leaflets tethering, the results favored surgical over catheter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Moderate-Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Caused by Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=393). Catheter Ablation vs. Surgical Therapy was evaluated. In both catheter ablation and surgical cohorts, patients who maintained sinus rhythm at follow-up demonstrated significant improvements in tricuspid regurgitation grade and right ventricular remodeling compared to those with recurrent atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: