Key result
Damage control laparotomy allows 50% of civilian trauma patients who would have previously died to survive, and its transition to the Australian military requires adequate intensive care.
Damage control laparotomy is a physiological approach suited to the Australian military environment, provided adequate postoperative intensive care and evacuation capabilities are available.
Supports military trauma use with ICU access; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is a physiological approach to the management of selected critically injured patients where the surgical technique is directed at minimising the metabolic insult, rather than restoring anatomic integrity. DCL consists of an abbreviated initial laparotomy that is limited to control of haemorrhage and contamination, intra-abdominal packing, and temporary closure. Secondary resuscitation continues in the intensive care unit for 24-48 h until normal physiology has been restored. The subsequent reoperation involves removal of the packing with definitive repair and closure. Using this approach 50% of civilian patients who would previously have died undergoing a definitive trauma laparotomy will survive. Doctrinal change in Australia has yet to enshrine a strong focus on restoration of key physiological variables as a major objective in treatment of all wartime casualties. Yet the philosophy of damage control is uniquely suited to the Australian military environment. However, transition of DCL to the military setting has to take account of operational constraints. The most important unresolved issue is how to provide adequate postoperative intensive care. An evacuation capability incorporating critical care transport teams needs to be present, as the patient must reach definitive care within 48 h.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neuhaus et al. (2004) conducted a review in Critically injured patients. Damage control laparotomy was evaluated. Damage control laparotomy allows 50% of civilian trauma patients who would have previously died to survive, and its transition to the Australian military requires adequate intensive care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: