Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ti (PG60) and Ti plus HA (HPG60) dense coatings with ultrahigh roughness (Ra: 74 +/- 8 microm and 53 +/- 18 microm, respectively) were compared to high Ti (Ti60) and Ti plus HA (HT60) high roughened porous coatings (Ra: 40 +/- 7 microm and 36 +/- 3 microm, respectively). Surfaces were implanted in cortical and trabecular bone of young adult (YOUNG), aged (AGED) and estrogen-deficient sheep (OVX) and analyzed by means of histology, histomorphometry and push-out tests 3 months after implantation. A significantly lower value in affinity index (AI) of PG60 when compared to TI60 (p < 0.01) was observed in cortical bone. In trabecular bone, lower values in AI were found in TI60 and PG60 when compared to their HA-coated surfaces (p < 0.0005). Bone ingrowth (BI) of TI60 and PG60 was significantly lower than that of the HA-coated surfaces in trabecular bone (p < 0.05). Significantly lower values in BI in OVX sheep in comparison to YOUNG sheep in both cortical and trabecular bone were observed (p < 0.05). Data showed that high roughness and Ti and HA-coated surfaces are suitable for aged and osteoporotic patients. HA coatings represent the most successful strategy in trabecular bone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borsari et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: