Key result
Cav3.1 T-type Ca2+ channel activation in lung microvascular endothelial cells mediates vaso-occlusion by sickled erythrocytes, with maximum current activation at -10 mV.
Cav3.1 T-type Ca2+ channels in lung microvascular endothelial cells mediate vaso-occlusion by sickled erythrocytes, highlighting a potential therapeutic target for pulmonary complications in sickle cell disease.
May identify Cav3.1 as a target for sickle cell pulmonary vaso-occlusion; animal data leave human translation untested.
In the present study, we demonstrate that lung microvascular endothelial cells express a Cav3.1 (alpha1G) T-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channel, whereas lung macrovascular endothelial cells do not express voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Voltage-dependent activation indicates that the Cav3.1 T-type Ca2+ current is shifted to a positive potential, at which maximum current activation is -10 mV; voltage-dependent conductance and inactivation properties suggest a "window current" in the range of -60 to -30 mV. Thrombin-induced transitions in membrane potential activate the Cav3.1 channel, resulting in a physiologically relevant rise in cytosolic Ca2+. Furthermore, activation of the Cav3.1 channel induces a procoagulant endothelial phenotype; eg, channel inhibition attenuates increased retention of sickled erythrocytes in the inflamed pulmonary circulation. We conclude that activation of the Cav3.1 channels selectively induces phenotypic changes in microvascular endothelial cells that mediate vaso-occlusion by sickled erythrocytes in the inflamed lung microcirculation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2003) studied Vaso-occlusion by sickled erythrocytes. Cav3.1 (alpha1G) T-type voltage-gated Ca2+ channel activation was evaluated on Vaso-occlusion by sickled erythrocytes in the inflamed pulmonary circulation. Cav3.1 T-type Ca2+ channel activation in lung microvascular endothelial cells mediates vaso-occlusion by sickled erythrocytes, with maximum current activation at -10 mV.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: