Key result
Rural residence did not significantly affect the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (aOR 0.92) or warfarin dispensation rates compared to urban residence among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Does rural residence impact warfarin use and clinical events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=25,284)
Does rural residence impact warfarin use and clinical events in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Odds Ratio: 0.92 (95% CI 0.77–1.11)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.2% vs 2.8%
In a universal access publicly-funded healthcare system, rural versus urban residence did not significantly impact warfarin use or clinical event rates in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Similar warfarin use and outcomes across rural-urban NVAF patients supports care equity in universal systems; leaves open post-DOAC disparities.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We studied whether anticoagulant use and outcomes differed between rural versus urban Canadian non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients prior to the introduction of direct oral anticoagulant drugs. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 25,284 adult Albertans with NVAF between April 1, 1999 and December 31, 2008. RESULTS: Compared to urban patients, rural patients were older (p = 0.0009) and had more comorbidities but lower bleeding risk at baseline. In the first year after NVAF diagnosis, urban patients were less likely to be hospitalized (aOR 0.82, 95%CI 0.77-0.89) or have an emergency department visit for any reason (aOR 0.61, 95%CI 0.56-0.66) but warfarin dispensation rates (72.2% vs 71.8% at 365 days, p = 0.98) and clinical outcomes were similar: 7.8% died in both groups, 3.2% rural vs. 2.8% urban had a stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) (aOR 0.92, 95%CI 0.77-1.11), and 6.6% vs. 5.7% (aOR 0.93, 95%CI 0.81-1.06) had a bleed. Baseline SSE risk did not impact warfarin dispensation (73.0% in those with high vs. 72.8% in those with low CHADS2 score, p = 0.85) but patients at higher baseline bleeding risk were less likely to be using warfarin (69.2% high vs. 73.6% low HASBLED score, p<0.0001) in the first 365 days after diagnosis. In warfarin users, bleeding was more frequent (7.5% vs 6.2%, aHR 1.51 [95%CI 1.33-1.72]) but death or SSE was less frequent (7.0% vs 18.1%, aHR 0.60 [0.54-0.66]). CONCLUSION: Warfarin use and clinical event rates did not differ between rural and urban NVAF patients in a universal access publically-funded healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=25,284). Rural residence vs. Urban residence was evaluated on Stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) at 1 year (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.77-1.11). Rural residence did not significantly affect the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (aOR 0.92) or warfarin dispensation rates compared to urban residence among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: