Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Oil-palm shell wastes were successfully converted into useful activated carbons in a systematic and novel approach by optimizing the pyrolysis conditions and subsequent steam activation conditions to maximize the BET surface area. The optimal activation conditions were a steam flow rate of 1.13 kg/h, hold time of 1.5 h and temperature of 950 °C, yielding BET areas of 1432.94 and 1382.95 m2/g for nitrogen-pyrolyzed and vacuum-pyrolyzed chars, respectively. In steam-chemical activation, one-step activation of oil-palm shell in steam with potassium carbonate (K2CO3), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) or potassium chloride (KCl) was conducted, resulting in BET area output order of shell/K2CO3 (710.56 m2/g) > shell/KCl (498.55 m2/g) > shell (366.7 m2/g) > shell/Na2CO3 (326.62 m2/g). This study reported the first use of KCl and Na2CO3 as chemical reagents in one-step steam-chemical activation of biomass. KCl-activated carbon exhibited retardation of tar formation property, resulting in better pore development than pure steam activated carbon. Phenol adsorption of activated carbon is not only a function of the BET surface area but also the type of pyrolysis used prior to physical activation. Activated carbon (BET area of 1192.29 m2/g) pyrolyzed under vacuum could adsorb 87% more phenol than that pyrolyzed in nitrogen flow which had a higher BET area of 1432.94 m2/g. Phenol adsorption capacities of activated carbons are: shell pyrolyzed under vacuum (275.5 mg/g) > shell pyrolyzed in N2 flow (147.1 mg/g) > shell/K2CO3 (145.7 mg/g) > shell without pyrolysis (12.1 mg/g). These activated carbons would be highly suitable in industry processes to remove phenolic contaminants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aik Chong Lua (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: