PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the most important and salient articles regarding home parenteral nutrition and quality of life published within the last 3 years. RECENT FINDINGS: In recent years, quality of life research in home parenteral nutrition has highlighted the need for a therapy-specific validated questionnaire. Several papers suggest a greater psychological input is required to better understand and evaluate this patient population. Issues surrounding the use of home parenteral nutrition in malignancy have arisen, prompting discussion on ideal timing and candidacy for home parenteral nutrition. Intestinal transplantation is evolving and improving, making it a possible alternative to home parenteral nutrition. Earlier referral is suggested as late referral can result in poorer outcome. SUMMARY: Home parenteral nutrition is a life-sustaining therapy for individuals with intestinal failure. There is now a relatively large amount of research into the quality of life in this population, but more focused measurements (in the form of validated therapy-specific questionnaires) are required to answer questions relating to cancer and intestinal transplantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chambers et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: